Compare AI models
Pick any two and watch the same prompt rendered by both.
Nano Banana
Imageby Google
Google's Gemini image model (nicknamed Nano Banana) sets the standard for conversational editing and character consistency.
Full review →Sora
Videoby OpenAI
OpenAI's Sora leads our video rankings with the most coherent motion, realistic physics, and longest usable clips of any model we tested.
Full review →| Metric | Nano Banana | Sora |
|---|---|---|
| Quality | 9.4 | 9.6✓ |
| Speed | 8.7✓ | 7.5 |
| Ease of use | 9.5✓ | 8.8 |
| Value | 8.6✓ | 8.0 |
| Max resolution | 1024px | 1080p |
| Pricing | Free tier / from $20/mo | From $20/mo (ChatGPT Plus) |
Nano Banana
- +Best-in-class conversational editing
- +Outstanding character consistency
- +Built into Gemini
- −Strict content filters
- −Less artistic ceiling than Midjourney
Sora
- +Best-in-class motion coherence and physics
- +Long, usable clips up to ~20s
- +Strong camera-movement control
- +Photoreal lighting and depth
- −Bundled with ChatGPT plans — limited bulk rendering
- −Weak with on-screen text and hands
- −Regional availability is limited
Same prompt, both models
The identical prompt, rendered by Nano Banana and Sora. Only verified outputs are shown — never another model's work.
“A neon-lit street at night, slow forward dolly, rain-slick reflections, cinematic”

“Close-up portrait turning toward camera, soft key light, shallow depth of field”

“Aerial drone gliding over a landscape at golden hour, long shadows”

“Product on a reflective surface, slow rotation, studio gradient light”
