Compare AI models
Pick any two and watch the same prompt rendered by both.
Flux
Imageby Black Forest Labs
Flux delivers the most reliable prompt following, the best in-image text, and open weights you can self-host and fine-tune.
Full review →Sora
Videoby OpenAI
OpenAI's Sora leads our video rankings with the most coherent motion, realistic physics, and longest usable clips of any model we tested.
Full review →| Metric | Flux | Sora |
|---|---|---|
| Quality | 9.2 | 9.6✓ |
| Speed | 8.8✓ | 7.5 |
| Ease of use | 8.2 | 8.8✓ |
| Value | 9.3✓ | 8.0 |
| Max resolution | 2048px | 1080p |
| Pricing | Open weights / API from $0.003 per image | From $20/mo (ChatGPT Plus) |
Flux
- +Best-in-class prompt following
- +Reliable in-image text
- +Open weights — self-host & fine-tune
- +Great for pipelines and automation
- −Less striking default aesthetic than Midjourney
- −Self-hosting needs a capable GPU
Sora
- +Best-in-class motion coherence and physics
- +Long, usable clips up to ~20s
- +Strong camera-movement control
- +Photoreal lighting and depth
- −Bundled with ChatGPT plans — limited bulk rendering
- −Weak with on-screen text and hands
- −Regional availability is limited
Same prompt, both models
The identical prompt, rendered by Flux and Sora. Only verified outputs are shown — never another model's work.
“A neon-lit street at night, slow forward dolly, rain-slick reflections, cinematic”

“Close-up portrait turning toward camera, soft key light, shallow depth of field”

“Aerial drone gliding over a landscape at golden hour, long shadows”

“Product on a reflective surface, slow rotation, studio gradient light”
