SeefieldCompare models
Veo 3
Runway Gen-3
Hailuo
Kling
Dream Machine
Seedance
Pika
Wan 2.1
Hunyuan Video
LTX Video
Sora
Veo 3
Runway Gen-3
Hailuo
Kling
Dream Machine
Head-to-head

Compare AI models

Pick any two and watch the same prompt rendered by both.

VS
Wan 2.1 logo

Wan 2.1

Video

by Alibaba

8.2

Alibaba's Wan is a leading open-weights video model — capable quality you can run and customize yourself.

Full review →
Higher overall score
Veo 3 logo

Veo 3

Video

by Google DeepMind

9.3

Veo 3 is the first top-tier model to generate video with matching audio — dialogue, effects, and ambience — directly from a prompt.

Full review →
MetricWan 2.1Veo 3
Quality8.29.5✓
Speed7.6✓7.2
Ease of use6.88.6✓
Value9.2✓7.8
Max resolution720p1080p
PricingOpen weights / freeFrom $20/mo (Google AI)

Wan 2.1

  • +Open weights, self-hostable
  • +Strong quality for open source
  • +No per-clip fees
  • −Needs a capable GPU
  • −More setup than hosted tools

Veo 3

  • +Native, synced audio generation
  • +Excellent realism and prompt following
  • +Integrated with Gemini and Flow
  • −Locked to higher-priced plans
  • −Slower renders at peak
  • −Regional rollout

Same prompt, both models

The identical prompt, rendered by Wan 2.1 and Veo 3. Only verified outputs are shown — never another model's work.

01

“A neon-lit street at night, slow forward dolly, rain-slick reflections, cinematic”

Wan 2.1
Real output
Veo 3
Real output
02

“Close-up portrait turning toward camera, soft key light, shallow depth of field”

Wan 2.1
Real output
Veo 3
Real output
03

“Aerial drone gliding over a landscape at golden hour, long shadows”

Wan 2.1
Real output
Veo 3
Real output
04

“Product on a reflective surface, slow rotation, studio gradient light”

Wan 2.1
Real output
Veo 3
Real output