SeefieldCompare models
Veo 3
Runway Gen-3
Hailuo
Kling
Dream Machine
Seedance
Pika
Wan 2.1
Hunyuan Video
LTX Video
Sora
Veo 3
Runway Gen-3
Hailuo
Kling
Dream Machine
Head-to-head

Compare AI models

Pick any two and watch the same prompt rendered by both.

VS
Wan 2.1 logo

Wan 2.1

Video

by Alibaba

8.2

Alibaba's Wan is a leading open-weights video model — capable quality you can run and customize yourself.

Full review →
Higher overall score
Veo 3 logo

Veo 3

Video

by Google DeepMind

9.3

Veo 3 is the first top-tier model to generate video with matching audio — dialogue, effects, and ambience — directly from a prompt.

Full review →
MetricWan 2.1Veo 3
Quality8.29.5
Speed7.67.2
Ease of use6.88.6
Value9.27.8
Max resolution720p1080p
PricingOpen weights / freeFrom $20/mo (Google AI)

Wan 2.1

  • +Open weights, self-hostable
  • +Strong quality for open source
  • +No per-clip fees
  • Needs a capable GPU
  • More setup than hosted tools

Veo 3

  • +Native, synced audio generation
  • +Excellent realism and prompt following
  • +Integrated with Gemini and Flow
  • Locked to higher-priced plans
  • Slower renders at peak
  • Regional rollout

Same prompt, both models

Identical prompt run through Wan 2.1 and Veo 3. Watch them side by side.

01

A neon-lit street at night, slow forward dolly, rain-slick reflections, cinematic

Wan 2.1
Veo 3
02

Close-up portrait turning toward camera, soft key light, shallow depth of field

Wan 2.1
Veo 3
03

Aerial drone gliding over a landscape at golden hour, long shadows

Wan 2.1
Veo 3
04

Product on a reflective surface, slow rotation, studio gradient light

Wan 2.1
Veo 3