SeefieldCompare models
Veo 3
Runway Gen-3
Hailuo
Kling
Dream Machine
Seedance
Pika
Wan 2.1
Hunyuan Video
LTX Video
Sora
Veo 3
Runway Gen-3
Hailuo
Kling
Dream Machine
Head-to-head

Compare AI models

Pick any two and watch the same prompt rendered by both.

VS
Wan 2.1 logo

Wan 2.1

Video

by Alibaba

8.2

Alibaba's Wan is a leading open-weights video model — capable quality you can run and customize yourself.

Full review →
Higher overall score
Runway Gen-3 logo

Runway Gen-3

Video

by Runway

9.0

Gen-3 pairs excellent video quality with the deepest creative toolset — motion brush, keyframes, and video-to-video make it the most controllable pick.

Full review →
MetricWan 2.1Runway Gen-3
Quality8.28.9
Speed7.68.7
Ease of use6.89.2
Value9.28.6
Max resolution720p1080p
PricingOpen weights / freeFree trial / from $12/mo

Wan 2.1

  • +Open weights, self-hostable
  • +Strong quality for open source
  • +No per-clip fees
  • Needs a capable GPU
  • More setup than hosted tools

Runway Gen-3

  • +Deep control: motion brush, keyframes, director mode
  • +Fast iteration and a strong web editor
  • +Reliable image-to-video
  • +Predictable credit-based pricing
  • Slightly behind Sora on pure realism
  • Credits can burn quickly at high resolution
  • Long sequences need manual stitching

Same prompt, both models

Identical prompt run through Wan 2.1 and Runway Gen-3. Watch them side by side.

01

A neon-lit street at night, slow forward dolly, rain-slick reflections, cinematic

Wan 2.1
Runway Gen-3
02

Close-up portrait turning toward camera, soft key light, shallow depth of field

Wan 2.1
Runway Gen-3
03

Aerial drone gliding over a landscape at golden hour, long shadows

Wan 2.1
Runway Gen-3
04

Product on a reflective surface, slow rotation, studio gradient light

Wan 2.1
Runway Gen-3