SeefieldCompare models
Veo 3
Runway Gen-3
Hailuo
Kling
Dream Machine
Seedance
Pika
Wan 2.1
Hunyuan Video
LTX Video
Sora
Veo 3
Runway Gen-3
Hailuo
Kling
Dream Machine
Head-to-head

Compare AI models

Pick any two and watch the same prompt rendered by both.

VS
Higher overall score
Runway Gen-3 logo

Runway Gen-3

Video

by Runway

9.0

Gen-3 pairs excellent video quality with the deepest creative toolset — motion brush, keyframes, and video-to-video make it the most controllable pick.

Full review →
Kling logo

Kling

Video

by Kuaishou

8.6

Kling delivers impressive realism and longer durations at a fraction of the cost, making it the best value pick in AI video today.

Full review →
MetricRunway Gen-3Kling
Quality8.98.4
Speed8.78.0
Ease of use9.27.8
Value8.69.4
Max resolution1080p1080p
PricingFree trial / from $12/moFree tier / from $7/mo

Runway Gen-3

  • +Deep control: motion brush, keyframes, director mode
  • +Fast iteration and a strong web editor
  • +Reliable image-to-video
  • +Predictable credit-based pricing
  • Slightly behind Sora on pure realism
  • Credits can burn quickly at high resolution
  • Long sequences need manual stitching

Kling

  • +Excellent price-to-quality ratio
  • +Long single-shot durations
  • +Sharp, high-resolution output
  • Interface less refined than rivals
  • English prompt handling can be literal
  • Queue times during peak hours

Same prompt, both models

Identical prompt run through Runway Gen-3 and Kling. Watch them side by side.

01

A neon-lit street at night, slow forward dolly, rain-slick reflections, cinematic

Runway Gen-3
Kling
02

Close-up portrait turning toward camera, soft key light, shallow depth of field

Runway Gen-3
Kling
03

Aerial drone gliding over a landscape at golden hour, long shadows

Runway Gen-3
Kling
04

Product on a reflective surface, slow rotation, studio gradient light

Runway Gen-3
Kling