Compare AI models
Pick any two and watch the same prompt rendered by both.
Runway Gen-3
Videoby Runway
Gen-3 pairs excellent video quality with the deepest creative toolset — motion brush, keyframes, and video-to-video make it the most controllable pick.
Full review →
Kling
Videoby Kuaishou
Kling delivers impressive realism and longer durations at a fraction of the cost, making it the best value pick in AI video today.
Full review →| Metric | Runway Gen-3 | Kling |
|---|---|---|
| Quality | 8.9✓ | 8.4 |
| Speed | 8.7✓ | 8.0 |
| Ease of use | 9.2✓ | 7.8 |
| Value | 8.6 | 9.4✓ |
| Max resolution | 1080p | 1080p |
| Pricing | Free trial / from $12/mo | Free tier / from $7/mo |
Runway Gen-3
- +Deep control: motion brush, keyframes, director mode
- +Fast iteration and a strong web editor
- +Reliable image-to-video
- +Predictable credit-based pricing
- −Slightly behind Sora on pure realism
- −Credits can burn quickly at high resolution
- −Long sequences need manual stitching
Kling
- +Excellent price-to-quality ratio
- +Long single-shot durations
- +Sharp, high-resolution output
- −Interface less refined than rivals
- −English prompt handling can be literal
- −Queue times during peak hours
Same prompt, both models
The identical prompt, rendered by Runway Gen-3 and Kling. Only verified outputs are shown — never another model's work.
“A neon-lit street at night, slow forward dolly, rain-slick reflections, cinematic”
“Close-up portrait turning toward camera, soft key light, shallow depth of field”
“Aerial drone gliding over a landscape at golden hour, long shadows”
“Product on a reflective surface, slow rotation, studio gradient light”