SeefieldCompare models
Veo 3
Runway Gen-3
Hailuo
Kling
Dream Machine
Seedance
Pika
Wan 2.1
Hunyuan Video
LTX Video
Sora
Veo 3
Runway Gen-3
Hailuo
Kling
Dream Machine
Head-to-head

Compare AI models

Pick any two and watch the same prompt rendered by both.

VS
Runway Gen-3 logo

Runway Gen-3

Video

by Runway

9.0

Gen-3 pairs excellent video quality with the deepest creative toolset — motion brush, keyframes, and video-to-video make it the most controllable pick.

Full review →
Higher overall score
Imagen 4 logo

Imagen 4

Image

by Google DeepMind

9.2

Google's Imagen 4 delivers exceptional photorealism and some of the cleanest in-image text of any model.

Full review →
MetricRunway Gen-3Imagen 4
Quality8.99.3
Speed8.78.6
Ease of use9.29.0
Value8.68.5
Max resolution1080p2048px
PricingFree trial / from $12/moFree tier / from $20/mo

Runway Gen-3

  • +Deep control: motion brush, keyframes, director mode
  • +Fast iteration and a strong web editor
  • +Reliable image-to-video
  • +Predictable credit-based pricing
  • Slightly behind Sora on pure realism
  • Credits can burn quickly at high resolution
  • Long sequences need manual stitching

Imagen 4

  • +Excellent photorealism
  • +Clean in-image text
  • +Available via Gemini & Vertex AI
  • Less stylistic personality
  • Filters can be conservative

Same prompt, both models

Identical prompt run through Runway Gen-3 and Imagen 4. Watch them side by side.

01

A neon-lit street at night, slow forward dolly, rain-slick reflections, cinematic

Runway Gen-3
Imagen 4
02

Close-up portrait turning toward camera, soft key light, shallow depth of field

Runway Gen-3
Imagen 4
03

Aerial drone gliding over a landscape at golden hour, long shadows

Runway Gen-3
Imagen 4
04

Product on a reflective surface, slow rotation, studio gradient light

Runway Gen-3
Imagen 4