SeefieldCompare models
Veo 3
Runway Gen-3
Hailuo
Kling
Dream Machine
Seedance
Pika
Wan 2.1
Hunyuan Video
LTX Video
Sora
Veo 3
Runway Gen-3
Hailuo
Kling
Dream Machine
Head-to-head

Compare AI models

Pick any two and watch the same prompt rendered by both.

VS
Higher overall score
Midjourney logo

Midjourney

Image

by Midjourney

9.5

Midjourney remains the benchmark for image aesthetics — nothing else matches its lighting, composition, and out-of-the-box beauty.

Full review →
Wan 2.1 logo

Wan 2.1

Video

by Alibaba

8.2

Alibaba's Wan is a leading open-weights video model — capable quality you can run and customize yourself.

Full review →
MetricMidjourneyWan 2.1
Quality9.78.2
Speed8.57.6
Ease of use9.06.8
Value8.49.2
Max resolution2048px720p
PricingFrom $10/moOpen weights / free

Midjourney

  • +Unmatched default aesthetics
  • +Excellent style references & personalization
  • +Big prompt-following gains in V6
  • +Now usable via a proper web app
  • No free tier
  • Less precise than rivals for exact layouts
  • Occasional over-stylisation

Wan 2.1

  • +Open weights, self-hostable
  • +Strong quality for open source
  • +No per-clip fees
  • Needs a capable GPU
  • More setup than hosted tools

Same prompt, both models

Identical prompt run through Midjourney and Wan 2.1. Watch them side by side.

01

A neon-lit street at night, slow forward dolly, rain-slick reflections, cinematic

Midjourney
Wan 2.1
02

Close-up portrait turning toward camera, soft key light, shallow depth of field

Midjourney
Wan 2.1
03

Aerial drone gliding over a landscape at golden hour, long shadows

Midjourney
Wan 2.1
04

Product on a reflective surface, slow rotation, studio gradient light

Midjourney
Wan 2.1