SeefieldCompare models
Veo 3
Runway Gen-3
Hailuo
Kling
Dream Machine
Seedance
Pika
Wan 2.1
Hunyuan Video
LTX Video
Sora
Veo 3
Runway Gen-3
Hailuo
Kling
Dream Machine
Head-to-head

Compare AI models

Pick any two and watch the same prompt rendered by both.

VS
Higher overall score
Imagen 4 logo

Imagen 4

Image

by Google DeepMind

9.2

Google's Imagen 4 delivers exceptional photorealism and some of the cleanest in-image text of any model.

Full review →
Wan 2.1 logo

Wan 2.1

Video

by Alibaba

8.2

Alibaba's Wan is a leading open-weights video model — capable quality you can run and customize yourself.

Full review →
MetricImagen 4Wan 2.1
Quality9.3✓8.2
Speed8.6✓7.6
Ease of use9.0✓6.8
Value8.59.2✓
Max resolution2048px720p
PricingFree tier / from $20/moOpen weights / free

Imagen 4

  • +Excellent photorealism
  • +Clean in-image text
  • +Available via Gemini & Vertex AI
  • −Less stylistic personality
  • −Filters can be conservative

Wan 2.1

  • +Open weights, self-hostable
  • +Strong quality for open source
  • +No per-clip fees
  • −Needs a capable GPU
  • −More setup than hosted tools

Same prompt, both models

The identical prompt, rendered by Imagen 4 and Wan 2.1. Only verified outputs are shown — never another model's work.

01

“A neon-lit street at night, slow forward dolly, rain-slick reflections, cinematic”

Imagen 4No verified output for this prompt yet
Wan 2.1
Real output
02

“Close-up portrait turning toward camera, soft key light, shallow depth of field”

Imagen 4No verified output for this prompt yet
Wan 2.1
Real output
03

“Aerial drone gliding over a landscape at golden hour, long shadows”

Imagen 4No verified output for this prompt yet
Wan 2.1
Real output
04

“Product on a reflective surface, slow rotation, studio gradient light”

Imagen 4No verified output for this prompt yet
Wan 2.1
Real output